Level: B2+
ICE Protests in the USA – Debate Points – Worksheet 1
PROS
- Encourages civic participation and shows that people care enough to demand change.
- Demonstrations often lead to policy debates, government responses, or even new laws.
- Brings together diverse groups who may not otherwise collaborate.
- Builds long-term social and political networks for future organizing.
- Strengthens local community organizing and grassroots power.
- Engages younger generations in politics and activism.
- Strengthens the movement for comprehensive immigration reform, including paths to citizenship and fairer visa processes.
- ICE should not be allowed to detain people without due process.
- The National Guard should not be used to suppress peaceful protests.
CONS
- Peaceful protesters often face tear gas, arrests, or force due to the actions of a small group.
- Some individuals or organized groups use protests as cover for looting or vandalism, with no real political motive.
- Many business owners lose inventory, windows, and months of income, and some never reopen.
- Protests can sometimes escalate into clashes with law enforcement or counter-protesters, leading to injuries or property damage.
- Many people, including those sympathetic to the cause, become confused or alienated when protests turn destructive.
- Insurance doesn’t always cover the full damage — especially in underinsured neighborhoods.
- Looting and destruction can drown out the original message of the protest.
- Media and public attention often shift from the reasons people protested to the violence that occurred.
- This weakens public support for reform and gives critics ammunition.
Note! Distinguishing between peaceful protesters, agitators, and opportunistic looters is crucial for understanding what really happened.